Hello, fellow Linux enthusiasts! I’m excited to embark on this journey with you, exploring the fascinating realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on our favorite operating system: Linux. Whether you’re setting up a home lab or home server, running Linux on a gaming laptop, or leveraging Linux in the cloud, this guide will highlight some of… continue reading.
Hello, fellow Linux enthusiasts! I’m excited to embark on this journey with you, exploring the fascinating realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on our favorite operating system: Linux. Whether you’re setting up a home lab or home server, running Linux on a gaming laptop, or leveraging Linux in the cloud, this guide will highlight some of… continue reading.
AI? It exists? No, I think not. Anything in this list that implies intelligence, including by way of company name is a charlatan, I say. It’s received wisdom, not intelligence.
I agree with the same. AI is an assisted tool that can help in non-living work and not something that you can take along with you. It is not intelligence and not even a real wisdom. You need to be very careful playing with the speculative hallucinations of AI or the outcomes. Apply AI where it can assist develop better approaches and not to everything. Right application of approaches is the goal of the development of the approaches so that it can sustain and not see with a negative outcome.
I’m saying it’s wrong even to call it AI. What would you call it if a system appeared that could actually reason? ‘Real AI’? Since I understand better the workings of machine learning (ML) systems, I’m more disillusioned about the use of the term AI. I think it’s being dishonestly used, very broadly.
Appreciate your thoughts. Today’s AI is more pattern recognition than real reasoning, agreed there. The term implies more than what’s actually happening, and I get the concern. However, these tools do still serve very practical purposes.
Of course, this isn’t the only technology where this happens.
Smart Devices. Like smart TVs. Reallly?
Virtual Reality (VR) cannot replicate the complete sensory range or physical sensation of reality.
Even Machine Learning, majority is mislabeled because it’s actually a simple statistical models or algorithms, not advanced “learning” as we think of it. Calling it “learning” is misleading that its more autonomous than it actually is.
Thanks for sparking a conversation about defining AI more accurately.
I agree with Hayden. Most of the data has been mislabeled. No tools can predict the human behaviour or anything. Those who think and can say that is all crap. These are the devastating steps if taken towards the assumptive guess related to human nature. When something is non-living, you should not try to make it speak the language of living. This is what i think. People might take different negative approaches such as treating mislabelled data in a accurate way, capturing the typing tags or word diffs and that is all rubbish crap and believing those is something that you are going to have a non-sense reality
I feel like it’s all too late now to really think about coming up with better terms for AI in its current form, particularly since the politicians are now all evangelising for it.
The AI/ML breakthrough is all about the attention transformer architecture, for LLMs, but also other algorithms for images etc. These are great advances. but don’t constitute intelligence, from what I’ve seen so far.
I can just imagine some years down the road, people proclaiming the advent of real AI, along with cringy explanations about the old AI not really being AI.