Interesting opinion piece:
- I Disagree
- I Agree
0
voters
It seems this article is measuring desktop “success” by how well AI agents would fare on it. I fundamentally disagree on this point—I think it’s a sad and dystopian future. I just want my desktop to be mine and mine alone. But yes, if agentic access is required for success, I presume Linux would not get it. Oh dear.
I don’t think there will be a year of the Linux desktop and that’s fine. I don’t think the community is ready to handle such a thing any way. However, if even a small percentage of users who are fed up with Windows and macOS make the switch, are genuinely interested, I’m happy enough.
5 Likes
The year of the Linux desktop was 2006 but the author might have been living under a rock.
It seems that Linux will be the only one desktop in the future. The rest will have been taken over by AI. 
4 Likes
“never” is always a strong word in technology. But his arguments are strong. The advantages of choice and modularity lack a universal, enforced standard.
1 Like
It doesn’t have to be… Linux is on a steady road up and it will eventually climb to a healthy 10% but it dominates in everything else. I like that we get to surprise people with a great os that they mostly never saw before!
5 Likes
I agree that there will not be the ‘Year of the Linux Desktop’ but for a different reason. I’d second @andreas that not being AI-ready is not the primary reason for that. Sooner or later AI hype will pass and AI bubble will deflate. A (reasonably) well-known citation reads:
“Anyone who thinks that people can be fooled or pushed around has an inaccurate and pretty low estimate of people – and he won’t do very well in advertising.”
– Leo Burnett
IMHO, actual reason is desktop OS (super) monopolies and overwhelming inertia of software infrastructure built on top/for Windows and Mac.
P.S. They say, that only about 10% of all applications are shrink-wrap products. The rest is custom software serving specific workflows of industries and organisations.
6 Likes
I don’t see Linux gaining that kind of market share until there is some central authority to market Linux on TV. How does Linux compete with the slick commercials of people so happy signing and dancing for Windows and Apple (which tells you nothing of the OS other than you are locked in)? I have been using Linux over 17 years and most people I talk to have never heard of Linux. How to get the word out and make Linux look slick and cool is the question. Linux doesn’t have that kind of money to waste on TV commercials.
4 Likes
To me, Linux has been a leading server operating system for many years and it’s been a leading wireless and mobile based platform, but we have to be realistic. Even in the server space, the enterprise server space only uses Linux to the extent that IBM is there to provide it, and the desktop was the place that Microsoft was the leader.
Today in browser based systems, Google dominates search and browsing, so their software and hardware leads, though there are some Linux kernel components and GNU utilities utilized in some cases; that’s just the way it is.
If Linux wants to lead in anything, as the paradigm shifts to something else, if it’s not there, it never will be a true leader of anything other than kernel technology.
4 Likes
I hope so. I’ve always been a bit of a niche person when it comes to everything. As long as Linux remains a niche product, the better it is for overall security.
4 Likes